Senior-led testing for product and engineering teams that need to understand what can actually be exploited, what matters most, and what to fix first.
Working with Huntrix was smooth and productive. [They] delivered a risk assessment that was both actionable and easy to communicate across the organization.
Brian Kendzior
VP of AI, RIOS Intelligent Machines
Angelica Rivera
CEO, Colmex Construction
I had the pleasure of working closely with Miguel. He has an incredible amount of knowledge. I’d work with Miguel again in a heartbeat and would encourage you to if given the opportunity.
Joseph Noa
Vulnerability Analyst, Pentester
Franco Medrano
Software Engineer, Amazon
Dr. Smith
Owner, OPS Family Care
Misaligned Scope
Slow Communication
Generic Reporting
Missed Business Logic
Static Output
A strong web application pentest should make risk clearer.
The complexity usually comes from somewhere else: unrealistic sales promises, weak scoping, offshore handoffs, generic reports, delayed communication, and testing teams that do not understand how modern products are built.
Signal
What Happens
Impact
Misaligned Scope
The sales process promises depth the delivery team is not equipped or staffed to provide.
Your team spends more time clarifying expectations than reducing risk.
Slow Communication
Questions sit unanswered, context gets lost, and offshore or layered delivery teams create delays.
Testing slows down, engineers lose momentum, and fixes get pushed later than they should.
Generic Reporting
Findings are written like checklist items instead of being tied to your application, workflows, users, and business model.
Your team has to translate the report into actual engineering decisions.
Missed Business Logic
Testers focus on common vulnerability classes but miss abuse cases specific to how your product works.
The issues most likely to affect customers, revenue, trust, or sensitive workflows can remain undiscovered.
Static Output
Findings are delivered as a PDF with limited support for tracking, ownership, retesting, or closure.
Vulnerabilities become documentation instead of actionable work your team can resolve and verify.
Risk clarity
Understand which vulnerabilities are exploitable, which are theoretical, and which deserve immediate attention.
Engineering focus
Give developers clear, prioritized remediation guidance instead of vague recommendations.
Business context
Tie findings to customer data, revenue impact, compliance exposure, product workflows, and trust.
Cleaner communication
Work directly with senior testers who can explain the issue, answer questions, and help move the work forward.
Resolution tracking
Move findings into Jira, Notion, ServiceNow, or another workflow your team already uses.
Product and engineering leaders responsible for customer-facing applications
SaaS companies preparing for customer security reviews
Companies preparing for SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI, HIPAA, or customer assurance requests
Mid-market teams that need third-party validation
Enterprise teams that want senior testing without large-consultancy drag
Software Supply Chain Failures
Cryptographic Failures
Insecure Design
Software or Data Integrity Failures
Security Logging and Alerting Failures
Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
Authentication and session management
Authorization and access control
Business logic flaws
Account takeover paths
Input validation and injection risks
Sensitive data exposure
File upload and content handling
Workflow bypasses
Transaction and state manipulation
Client-side and server-side security issues
OWASP Top 10 coverage
Application-specific attack paths
Professional cybersecurity services
We learn the application, user roles, sensitive workflows, business goals, timeline, and compliance needs.
We identify the areas most likely to create meaningful impact: customer data, payments, admin actions, permissions, integrations, authentication flows, and high-value workflows.
Senior testers assess the application using real attacker techniques, not just automated scanning.
When useful, we use AI and automation to accelerate coverage and test ideation. Human judgment stays in control.
We test broken assumptions, privilege abuse, workflow bypasses, state manipulation, and edge cases that require human reasoning.
We validate findings, remove noise, prioritize by impact, and explain why each issue matters.
Findings can move into Jira, Notion, ServiceNow, or the workflow your team already uses.
We confirm fixes, update statuses, and help your team prove remediation.
Continuous Testing
For teams shipping often and needing recurring assessment instead of a once-a-year snapshot.
Manual Pentest
For teams that need depth, business logic assessment, and human attacker simulation.
AI-Enhanced Pentest
For teams that want efficient coverage and accelerated test planning, with senior testers still in control.
Hybrid Testing
For teams that want manual depth supported by targeted automation and AI-enhanced workflows.
You can expect the following from our team:
Professional cybersecurity services
No.
Risk Score
Finding
1
Resolved
Missing Authentication on Internal API Route
2
Critical
Unauthenticated API Data Exposure
3
Critical
Hardcoded CI/CD Deployment Token Allowed Unauthorized Pipeline Access
4
Critical
Prompt Injection Enabled Unauthorized Retrieval of Private User Data
5
High
AI Assistant Failed to Enforce Tenant Boundaries During Retrieval-Augmented Responses
6
High
Session Tokens Remained Valid After Logout
7
High
Stored Cross-Site Scripting Allowed Script Execution in Administrative User Sessions
8
Medium
Missing Rate Limiting on Login API Supports Password Spraying
9
Medium
Missing CI/CD Dependency Vulnerability Gates
10
Low
Security Headers Missing from Web Application Responses
Critical
async function testPublicEndpoint() {
const response = await fetch("https://api.example.com/api/accounts/users", {
method: "GET",
headers: {
"Accept": "application/json"
// No Authorization header included
}
});
const data = await response.json();
...
console.table(data.slice(0, 3).map(user => ({
id: user.id,
username: user.userName,
email: user.email,
role: user.roles?.[0]
})));
}
testPublicEndpoint();
Huntrix gives your team direct access to senior security practitioners without the slow, expensive bureocratic layers that often make consulting painful, bloated and expensive for no reason.
Web application pentesting is a security assessment that tests a web application for vulnerabilities an attacker could exploit. It evaluates areas such as broken access controls, authentication, authorization, session handling, input validation, sensitive data exposure, business logic, and application-specific attack paths. Web app testing helps your team understand what can actually be abused, what creates business risk, and what should be fixed first.
Vulnerability scanning uses automated tools to identify known patterns. It can be useful, but it often misses context, exploitability, chained issues, authorization abuse, and business logic flaws. Vulnerability scanning is an important part of a mature security program, but it should not be the only way of obtaining vulnerability data.
Web application pentesting uses human judgment and creativity to test how the application behaves in real scenarios. Huntrix uses manual testing, AI-enhanced techniques when useful, and senior tester analysis to validate what matters. This human-in-the-loop approach helps us pair automation, vuln scanning and AI speed efficiencies with human judgement, creativity and expertise.
Huntrix tests for vulnerabilities across the application’s identity, access, data, workflow, and business logic layers.
Common testing areas include authentication flaws, broken access control, session management issues, injection risks, sensitive data exposure, insecure file handling, account takeover paths, workflow bypasses, privilege abuse, and OWASP Top 10 risks.
Pricing depends on various factors, for example:
Huntrix keeps pricing competitive through lean operations and senior-focused delivery. The best next step is a scope review so we can understand your application and recommend the right level of testing.
When useful, yes. We believe AI can help accelerate planning, test ideation, coverage analysis, and workflow review. But it does not replace senior tester judgment, creativity and experience.
Huntrix can support manual, AI-enhanced, hybrid, or continuous testing approaches depending on your application, risk profile, timeline, and goals.
Huntrix web application pentesting is senior-led and manual at its core. We use automation, custom tooling, and AI-enhanced workflows (when approved by our clients) where they improve efficiency or coverage, but the assessment is driven by human analysis.
Unlike many automated pentesting firms that just run tools and export results, our goal is to validate real risk. We translate that risk into financial impacts and business disruption scenarios. Then we provide an approach for proactively solving root causes and individual threat cases.
Every application is different and there is no “one size fits all” approach Timeline depends on the size of the application, number of user roles, complexity of workflows, testing depth, and urgency. We typically see pentests range from 1-week to 3-week projects depending on these factors.
A focused assessment may take less time, while a complex application with multiple roles, sensitive workflows, integrations, and compliance requirements may need a longer testing window.
Our scope review helps us define a realistic timeline before work begins with your team.
We will provide you with a requirements worksheet before testing begins. Typical inputs include application access, test accounts, user roles, scope details, technical contacts, testing windows, and any business or compliance goals.
For stronger testing, we also like to understand which workflows matter most to the business, where sensitive data lives, what customer commitments exist, and what areas your team is most concerned about.
Deliverables include an executive summary, technical findings, business-risk explanations, proof-of-concept evidence, severity ratings, remediation guidance, retest results, and compliance-supporting documentation.
Findings can also be structured for Jira, Notion, ServiceNow, or another remediation workflow your team already uses.
Yes. Web application pentesting supports compliance and customer assurance by providing third-party validation, risk documentation, technical findings, remediation evidence, and retest results.
It supports frameworks such as SOC 2 (e.g., CC7.1, CC7.2, CC7.3), ISO 27001 (A.12.6.1, A.14.2.8), PCI DSS (11.3), and HIPAA (164.308(a)(8)) by demonstrating ongoing vulnerability identification, risk management, and security testing practices.
The assessment IS NOT treated only as a checkbox. We believe the testing value derives from strong outcomes and evidence that your team can use to understand and reduce real application risk.
👋 Hey, looking forward to meeting you!
Let's get started
By providing your information, you consent to us contacting you by email regarding the data provided. We do not sell your personal information, and you can withdraw consent at any time. By submitting this form, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Get a Quote
👋 Hey, tell us more about what tests you need!
You can select multiple options depending on your needs.
By providing your information, you consent to us contacting you by email or phone regarding the data provided. We do not sell your personal information, and you can withdraw consent at any time. By submitting this form, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
